pyTelegramBotAPI/examples/webhook_examples
v.korobov c0ed659f30 Minor code style fixes 2022-08-08 23:07:04 +03:00
..
README.md Fix readme typos 2022-01-03 16:30:49 +04:00
run_webhooks.py Divided async and sync versions into aio & sync folders 2022-07-09 22:30:36 +05:00
webhook_aiohttp_echo_bot.py fix: some intendation 2018-08-17 13:01:03 +03:00
webhook_cherrypy_echo_bot.py fix: some intendation 2018-08-17 13:01:03 +03:00
webhook_cpython_echo_bot.py Update example for api server check webhook alive. 2018-12-29 23:49:10 +08:00
webhook_fastapi_echo_bot.py Minor code style fixes 2022-08-08 23:07:04 +03:00
webhook_flask_echo_bot.py fix: some intendation 2018-08-17 13:01:03 +03:00
webhook_flask_heroku_echo.py Heroku example update 2021-03-28 11:54:46 +03:00
webhook_tornado_echo_bot.py Code base cleanup 2022-01-24 22:38:35 +03:00
webhook_twisted_echo_bot.py add short description to example and readme files 2020-12-17 15:34:36 +03:00

README.md

Webhook examples using pyTelegramBotAPI

There are 5 examples in this directory using different libraries:

  • Python (CPython): webhook_cpython_echo_bot.py

    • Pros:
      • Official python libraries, it works out of the box (doesn't require to install anything).
      • Works with Python 2 and Python 3 (need to be converted with 2to3).
    • Cons:
      • Ugly code.
      • Many things to handle yourself, this can lead to errors.
      • Not powerful, do the trick but the performance is low.
  • CherryPy (3.8.0): webhook_cherrypy_echo_bot.py

    • Pros:
      • It's a web application framework, cleaner code, uses objects for defining the web application.
      • Very good performance.
      • The project seems to be active, latest version is recent.
      • Works with Python 2 and Python 3.
    • Cons:
      • Some things are not very intuitive, reading the doc is a must.
  • Flask (0.10.1): webhook_flask_echo_bot.py

    • Pros:
      • It's a web application framework, cleaner code, uses decorator which can be nice.
      • Good performance.
      • It's intuitive if you know how web application works.
    • Cons:
      • The project seems not to be very active, latest version dates 2013.
      • They don't recommend to use it with Python 3, but may work.
      • May be a oversized for just handling webhook petitions.
  • aiohttp (1.2.0): webhook_aiohttp_echo_bot.py

    • Pros:
      • It's a web application framework
      • Python 3 compatible
      • Asynchronous, excellent performance
      • Utilizes new async/await syntax
    • Cons:
      • Requires Python 3.4.2+, don't work with Python 2
  • Twisted (20.3.0): webhook_twisted_echo_bot.py

    • Pros:
      • Asynchronous event-driven networking engine
      • Very high performance
      • Built-in support for many internet protocols
    • Cons:
      • Twisted is low-level, which may be good or bad depending on use case
      • Considerable learning curve - reading docs is a must.
  • FastAPI(0.70.1): webhook_fastapi_echo_bot.py

    • Pros:
      • Can be written for both sync and async
      • Good documentation
    • Cons:
      • Requires python 3.6+

*Latest update of this document: 01-03-2022